首页 体育内容详情
足球情报分析(www.99cx.vip):Are data on Penang south reclamation project manipulated to deceive?

足球情报分析(www.99cx.vip):Are data on Penang south reclamation project manipulated to deceive?

分类:体育

网址:

SEO查询: 爱站网 站长工具

点击直达

足球情报分析www.99cx.vip)是一个开放皇冠体育网址代理APP下载、皇冠体育网址会员APP下载、皇冠体育网址线路APP下载、皇冠体育网址登录APP下载的官方平台。足球情报分析上足球分析专家数据更新最快。足球情报分析开放皇冠官方会员注册、皇冠官方代理开户等业务。

AN article in The Star, August 3, claims “200 satellite images confirm little fishing activity at PSI (Penang south islands) site”. 

What is there to support this claim?

The project proponents, with the strong backing of the Penang government, have an agenda – to bulldoze through the Penang south reclamation project.  To do this they have produced a lot of visuals, including videos and animations, to show the beauty and luxury of the place. 

Housing developers also produce a lot of beautiful brochures about their planned projects, which when completed are seldom the same as what was shown.

Since there are strong protests from the local community, including more than 5,000 fishermen, the project proponents need to show that the 1,800ha  reclamation site is not the rich fishing grounds that the fisherfolk say it is.

State executive councillor for Infrastructure and Transport Zairil Khir Johari has even said that the site is nothing more than “shallow, muddy water”.

The “shallow muddy water” is where the best prawns and pomfret are found.

,

三公大吃小www.eth108.vip)(三公开船)是用以太坊区块高度哈希值开奖的棋牌游戏,有别于传统三公大吃小(三公开船)棋牌游戏,三公大吃小(三公开船)游戏绝对公平,结果绝对无法预测。三公大吃小(三公开船)由玩家PK,平台不参与。

,

 Thus, the recent emergence of “satellite images” showing very little fishing activity in the zone is another attempt to pull wool over the eyes of Penang folk.

Are the small inshore fishing boats big enough to be detected by the satellite cameras? 

Also, the boats go out to set their nets when the tide is rising and then they return to base. Several hours later, they go out again to haul in the nets. Now if the pictures were taken at the time the boats have returned to base after setting their nets, no boats would be seen in the pictures .

In the case of pictures taken at night, would the small, battery-powered lights on the inshore boats be visible?

It is not uncommon for data to be manipulated to create a certain perception. There could be hundreds of photos showing a lot of inshore fishing boats in the reclamation area, but it would not be in the interest of the project proponents to show them.

It is a known fact that Zone B trawlers often encroach on Zone A to catch prawns and fish. Now, if there is nothing to catch in Zone A (the Bay of Teluk Kumbar) as Zairil has implied, why would the trawlers encroach on the area at the risk of arrest by marine police? 

The environment impact assessment has showed “expert” findings that inshore fishermen could get better catch further out to sea. What kind of study showed this? Did the experts perform daily practical fishing experiments in the deeper sea for at least 6 months before coming to this conclusion? Or did they spend six months fishing with the inshore fishermen to get true, first-hand information about the richness of this fishing ground? Otherwise, their “findings” would be pure speculation, wouldn’t they? – August 9, 2022.

* Ravinder Singh reads The Malaysian Insight. 

  • 新2足球信用平台出租(www.hg108.vip) @回复Ta

    2022-08-28 00:00:43 

    据国家卫健委19日消息,18日0时至24时,31个省(自治区、直辖市)和新疆生产建设兵团报告新增新冠肺炎本土病例80例内蒙古46例 ,其中呼和浩特市42例、包头市4例;江苏19例 ,均在苏州市;辽宁8例 ,均在葫芦岛市;广东3例 ,均在深圳市;云南3例 ,其中德宏傣族景颇族自治州2例、红河哈尼族彝族自治州1例;浙江1例 ,在绍兴市),含8例由无症状感染者转为确诊病例(江苏6例,云南2例)。 难得的好文

发布评论